Part 1. California
Stephen's imaginatively named blog
Wednesday, March 15, 2023
Asia/California 2023
Thursday, February 4, 2021
A Walk in the Hamptons
August 2020
It’s almost a cliché to note that inequality has risen to an obscene level in this country, but that remains a somewhat abstract concept to the many of us who rarely mix outside of our own caste. Of course, we all know about the gap between the rich and the poor, but if you’re somewhere in the middle, like me, you may not have a visceral feeling of just how obscene. I could give you statistics about the millions of people who fly first class from one vacation home to the next, or the millions more who can’t come up with the money to keep the heat on, but it wouldn’t have the impact that a few afternoons of strolling along the mansion-lined streets of eastern Long Island (which I recently did) or any number of the other haunts of the pampered class, can have in clarifying what American inequality really means.
I’m a middle class guy – richer than some, poorer that others – and in the Hamptons I’m still a middle class guy, but it feels different. In the city I’m part of a continuum, but out there there is no continuum. There are the barons and the peasants, and a middle class observer feels like a 5’8” outsider in the Swiftian world of the Lilliputians and Brobdingnagians.
On the back roads of East Hampton, enormous, and enormously elegant, leisure homes, hide behind high hedges, affording just enough of a peek to passers-by to allow for the desired sighs of admiration and envy. Hundreds of them – thousands of them. They are the playthings of people who are so far above me in wealth (and maybe of you too) that I can’t even fantasize about ever joining them. But there’s another caste of people in the Hamptons – people who are absolutely essential in making it what it is. I’m talking about the legions of laborers and gardeners, who work tirelessly to plant and maintain the flower beds and lawns and pristine landscaping that create an atmosphere of understated prosperity, and who are the people you mostly see on the roads and lawns, especially in this time of covid-induced timidity. Most of these guys toiling in the hot sun look like impoverished immigrants to me, and seem as far below my station as their employers are above it. The whole scene paints a stark picture of the feudal economy that our country is fast approaching. But what comes first to my mind is not so much England in the 13th century, as the land of the Eloi and Morlocks in H.G. Well’s Time Machine, absent the unfortunate cannibalism. In that allegory, countless scurrying workers create a world of leisure and luxury for a population of sweet but ignorant layabouts. Of course, in that story the Morlocks are the bad guys, and the Eloi don’t understand the situation. In our world, it’s the opposite.
Which brings me to my theme - resentment. My father taught me not to count other people’s money, but it’s hard not to feel just a little jealous of all this wealth; and that jealousy slides over into resentment if I allow myself to contemplate the merit, or lack of it, in the American economic hierarchy. What did that 25 year old kid driving the Mercedes convertible do to deserve his status that the 4’11’ Guatemalan standing on a ladder to trim the 4 meter hedges neglected to do? Choose the right parents, most likely. But my resentment, however justified, is mild compared to the resentment felt by working class white people who, we are told, voted for Donald Trump and the Republicans en mass, and don’t feel the least bit sheepish about it, even now, as we enter a new depression. The received explanation is resentment – not of the upper crust; but of the blacks and immigrants who they see as their competition for their rightful place in the hierarchy, however low. Of course, in supporting the Republicans, they are supporting the worst of the baronial elitists – the very people who are unabashedly hastening our descent into feudalism. But we are naive if we think they have simply been bamboozled into thinking the Republicans are going to help them. They seem more than willing to accept their peasant fate in exchange for indulging their resentment of those they see as encroaching on their rightful status, and they are perfectly entitled to feel that way, but I maintain that their resentment is misplaced, and seriously so. If they insist on nurturing their resentments above all other concerns, then they should at least get it right. Resent the rich, who have effectively stolen the country, and who add to their booty daily by dominating the political system, rather than people who are marginally worse off, and whom you fear will become marginally better off.
I speculate that their failure to do so is attributable, at least in part, to their unfamiliarity with the gaping inequality that separates them from the true owners of the country - an unfamiliarity that applied equally to me, and probably to most of us, who haven’t had the chance to experience it on a personal level. I suspect that those undernourished hedge trimmers have a better feel for the wealth gap than I ever did. Those of us who want a more equitable economy have to recognize that these working class conservatives are our political enemies, and that their misplaced resentments stand in the way of our political goals. Maybe those resentments have been influenced by those who benefit from them; maybe not. But in any case, we shouldn’t be shy about trying to influence them ourselves, in the service of good, as we see it. So, in the spirit of the aforementioned Mr Swift, I have a modest proposal. Let’s encourage white, working class Trump voters to visit the Hamptons, or their nearest playground of the rich. Let them take in the whole width and breadth of these Shangri-Las. I’m guessing that walking among the miles and miles of beautiful estates will be more effective in stoking their resentment of the rich than simply knowing that people like the Koch brothers have 80 billion dollars, while they had to scrounge for the bus fare out to Riverhead. And I’m hoping that they will be affected the same way I was, and come away with a little more understanding of who their economic enemies are, and where they should be focusing their anger.
Monday, March 12, 2018
Sri Lanka 2018
Ella.
Bentota.
Tuesday, August 8, 2017
Israel, May 2017
![]() |
Tel Aviv |
![]() |
The view looking south from the balcony |
![]() |
Synagogue floor from Roman era |
![]() |
Temple Mount with enforcers |
![]() |
Beth in dead sea |
![]() |
Jerusalem - Western Wall |
![]() |
Dinner starters |
Israel. The promised land. The holy land. The land where we landed, finally, after 20 hours of traveling, after 2000 years of exile, is hot as hell - 104 degrees, and this is only May. Right away you're starting to feel a little grateful for the exile.
Israel is not an ordinary country; the Jews are not an ordinary people, and their history is not an ordinary history. I could write a long essay trying to justify those propositions, but it wouldn't be as edifying as the observation that
"Europe has now changed completely.....When my father was a young man in Vilna, every wall in europe said "Jews go home to Palestine". Fifty years later, when he went back to europe on a visit, the walls all screamed, "Jews get out of Palestine".
.....Amos Oz
So this can't be an ordinary travelogue about the first two weeks of our spring vacation. Here you can't escape history, or politics. At least I can't. Everywhere there are reminders of the long train of events that led to my existence in America, and to how close I, and maybe you, came to being a lampshade. And still could become one, with just a little tweak to the political winds that whisked the Trump regime into power. And so I was genuinely moved when the cabdriver taking us into Tel Aviv, upon hearing I was Jewish, said "welcome home." We should take Oz's point; in Europe, and everywhere else, nothing really changes completely.
Our flat in Tel Aviv is on the 22st floor of a sparkling modern high rise with spectacular views from a curved balcony. The Mediterranean on the right, the old city of Jaffa in the middle distance, and the road to Jerusalem going off to the left. Beyond Jaffa the cityscape stretches to the horizon, which struck me as odd, since we are located on the southern edge of the city and I didn't expect the urban sprawl go beyond Tel Aviv; that is, I didn't realize how big the metropolitan area is, given that the city proper has less than half a million residents. It reminds me, physically, of Bangkok, but with a sea instead of a river. There are dozens of skyscrapers, and dozens more being built. At a distance it looks like Miami Beach, but up close you see that there are teeming third world neighborhoods between the towers, at least in some areas. In others, like ours, Neve Tzedek, there's a sort of West Village yuppy vibe, with leafy lanes and chichi shops. But the prices certainly don't remind me of Bangkok. Nothing is cheaper than you find in New York, and many things are a lot more. Fortunately we're not paying for this flat, so we can afford to eat.
But it's not the layout of the place that's so interesting; it's that it's a Jewish country. How weird is that? And they speak Hebrew, a language that turns out to be about as easy for us travelers as Thai. Yeah, I had a bar mitzvah, but I seem to have retained nothing of the language (never knew any, really) or even the alphabet (knew reasonably well, I think). I blame that on the poor instruction at my (so-called) Hebrew school, and not on my complete indifference to the subject. So just getting around isn't that easy. English isn't as ubiquitous here as you'd think. Everyone doesn't speak it (we were misinformed), and a lot of the signage is in Hebrew only. Even worse, the signs that are in English are usually inadequate. I suspect the signs in Hebrew are also, since the country serms to have an attitude problem when it comes to information. At Yad Vashem, for example, the nice man at the information desk peeled a single sheet diagram of the place off a thick stack of them and pointed out on it the entrance and exit and a few other features, but when I said thank you and went to take it he said "12 sheckels". They're just not as forthcoming with information as we're used to. The diagram itself turned out to be so poorly conceived that you were better off just exploring on your own rather than trying to follow it. Despite all this I learned only two Hebrew words in two weeks: ezerakh vatiq: Senior citizen.
Curiously, the language we heard most often in our elevator was neither Hebrew nor English, but French. I never learned why our building had so many francophones, but a museum director told us that Shimon Peres was a great Francophile, and tried to steer the country into adapting French, rather than Arabic, as it's second language. As a result, he said, very few Jews speak Arabic whereas most of the Arabs speak Hebrew. I'm not convinced that that's the explanation for this asymmetry; maybe it's more related to the ice cold shoulder gived to the Israelis by even the least hostile of their neighbors, but it is true that few Jews here speak Arabic.
We spent the first few days walking around Tel Aviv dodging the kids on electric bicycles who seem to regard the sidewalks as bike lanes, and going to museums. The best was the diaspora museum, which was great but should have been better. It was about various Jewish communities around the world over the last few thousand years, but it failed to do what I wanted it to do: parse the movements of the Jewish population in space and time. How many Jews were where and when? Where did they go? What happened to them? With Jews, you know that many were murdered, many were ethnically cleansed, and many were de-jewed, one way or another, over the centuries. But I don't have a sense of where most of the Jews were at any given time, and I can't begin to trace their travels back and forth across Europe and the Mediterranean, fleeing from one racist tyranny after another. So, the take-home message I got from this museum is that we need another museum, for just that.
As is par for our course, a disproportionate percentage of our touristing effort went into planning what to eat and where to eat it. We had recently seen a documentary film about Israeli cuisine, and we eagarly sought out several of its recommendations. A Persian lunch counter in a strip mall was particularly worth the detour. A lot of the best stuff is purveyed by Israeli Arabs, like a hummus place in Jaffa that serves their signature product in huge bowls, and the pastry shops in Haifa where you take an empty box and fill it from dozens of piles of various phyllo/nut/honey concoctions that run circles around the sort of baklava you usually get in America. But the most memorable tip we got from the movie sent us down a series of dark, one-way streets in Jaffa to a place where no one spoke a word of English, and the feisty waitress had to use hand gestures to explain the menu, the most colorful of which revealed a hitherto unsuspected homolgy between felafel and felatio. (Of course! Even the words are almost the same.). My favorite restaurant, though, was the one a cab driver told us about - a busy, touristy place sprawling onto the quai in Jaffa. Instead of offering a choice of appetizers, they bring you pretty much the whole menu - dozens of delicious dips and salads. When a waiter scooped up a bowl of a particularly superlative one that I hadn't quite finished I started to protest, until I realized he had just gone to refill it. The perfectly grilled whole fish that constitutes the main course would make a fine meal on its own, but after the orgy of appetizers it seemed almost superfluous. We went to that place twice.
Jerusalem
There is frequent and fast bus service between Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, so we used it to get there on our 5th day in Israel, which required getting aquatinted with the Central bus station. This is, perversely, on the edge of Tel Aviv, in a sketchy neighborhood. The Central bus station is an attraction in itself, in a quirky way. It is enormous - the largest in the world when it was built. Its world, though, is clearly the third world. It doesn't look like it was ever new.
Escalators and stairways crisscross cavernous spaces almost devoid of people. Grubby shops selling cheap food and chachkas hide in various alcoves. Information in English is hard to come by (don't expect any at the information booth, even if you are lucky enough to find that) but there is in fact, a fast bus every 15 minutes to Jerusalem, and that's the best way to get there.
It was perhaps a bad omen that my first step in Jerusalem was nearly fatal. Among our fellow bus passengers were several Israeli soldiers, a few of whom carried very serious-looking guns, rather nonchalantly, it seemed to me. If anything, it made me feel safer, actually. (A bus on this route was blown up by Arabs in the 90s.). As I stepped off the bus in a scrum of soldiers and civilians, the straps of the small backpack I was carrying got entangled in the menacingly complex parts of a machine gun slung over the shoulder of a teenage soldier, and we both instictively pulled away from each other, but the straps stayed entangled. Luckily, he just smiled, rather than interpret that tug as someone trying to grab his gun. I bet he was still in training, and hadn't gotten to the part where they teach you that if someone tries to grab your gun, just kill him instantly. As it happened, I got to take a second step, and made my way toward the old city.
Despite the fact that Jerusalem is probably the most scrutinized city in the world, and that I am at least as focused on the politics of the middle East as I am on anything else on the planet, I had no real feel for the layout of the place. Turns out the Jerusalem bus station is about a half hour walk from the old city, the kernal of contention that signifies Jerusalem for almost everyone. But you don't have to walk - there's a modern streetcar ( that would put any similar conveyance in America to shame) that will glide you past rows of inviting cafes and markets right up to the gates of the old city. To get oriented we took a two hour walking tour led by the terrific, but unfortunately named, guide, Yoni. The first thing Yoni told us was to ignore all the armed soldiers milling about since they were tourists, just like us. OK.... Then we plunged into the walled square kilometer that everyone in the western world concedes is the navel of religeosity, the place where the real world once contacted the imagined world of the gods (a function formerly filled by Mt Olympus). The old city turns out to be a warren of densly packed narrow streets, teeming with tourists. In the Muslim quarter (more like the Muslim two fifths) the narrow streets are covered by awnings and lined with hundreds of little shops, giving the feel of an indoor bazaar. This is the place to be if you need to buy a set of Turkish coffee cups or a fez. They also have good smoothies. The other quarters seem less commercial, but still have quaint squares and cafes, along with various churches and other storied monuments. The most renowned of these is the church of the holy sepulchre, where the scrum of tourists is such that it is hard to see the floor tiles. It is here that I saw people lining up to prostrate themselves on a stone slab - the stone of anointing - where Jesus' body was not lain out for a short time. I say not, because, besides the usual fallacious nonsense associated with religeous relics, this one forgoes even any pretention of authenticity: it was placed in the church in the 19th century as part of a reconstruction. And yet countless worshippers get down on all fours and awkwardly slide themselves onto the stone, polished smooth by the thousands who have preceded them. I found it a very discouraging comment on the human condition.
This ancient, walled-in compound may be the most contested bit of land in the world, but the residential and commercial areas are a love fest compared to the temple mount, a plateau constituting a few acres of seething hatred that exposes the true meaning of religion for anyone who cares to see it. The moslems control the actual plateau, but in a grudging concession they are required to allow access to infidels a few hours a week, and, for reasons I can't articulate, I wanted to go up there. The Jews control the gate, and you have to pass through their security before being allowed in, which was stricter than any other security check we experienced in Israel, including the flights in and out. Everyone is interviewed separately, and you have to convince them that you are not going to commit any religeous act while you're up there, such as praying for rain. Apparently the moslems take great offense if their monopoly on piety is challenged in even the slightest way, and the Jews are happy to concede that to them. On the plateau, you can see, but not enter, the two mosques that were built in the 7th century over the ruins of the Jewish temple destroyed by the Romans 600 years previously. The more spectacular one, with the gilded dome, has become symbolic of Jerusalem, as the Eiffel tower is of Paris, but up close it looks like it could use a bit of a touch up. Still kind of cool, though. The most interesting thing on the temple Mount for me, however, was to experience a tiny whiff of what it would be like to live under the jurisdiction of the moslem religious police. They patrol the open plazas on the plateau in plain clothes, hoping to catch anyone who deviates from the onerous rules that no doubt suck the joy out of life for anyone oppressed by them. And in the few minutes I was up there I managed to run afoul of one such rule; one that I had not been aware of, and one that no person in his right mind would even imgine. A young couple asked me to take their picture standing in front of the dome, which I did. As I handed the camera back, one of these guardians of the true faith ran up, and all three of us thought he was going to say that photography was forbidden, but, no, the offense was that the couple were touching each other when I took the picture. That is, their shoulders were touching. Fortunately, this is still Israel, and he wasn't carrying a whip and a gun, so he let them off with a warning. I suppose this incident is not surprising - it's the sort of thing you hear about every day in the news - but, as they say about skiing the back bowls at Vail, you gotta be there to really appreciate it.
As is well known, in 1948 the Arabs, in the form of the Jordanians, captured the old city (from the British, formally). They expelled the Jews from the Jewish quarter, physically destroyed it and barred Jews from entering the city ever again. 19 years later the Jews, in the form of the Israelis, captured the old city (from Jordan, formally), expelled the muslims, destroyed the Muslim quarter and barred Muslims from ever entering the city again. Oh...no...wait...that's not what they did. What they actually did was to leave the Muslim quarter alone, open the city to everyone and hand over the administration of the temple mount to the moslems. To my mind it is just this sort of thing that sits at the core of the Arab/Jew conflict. The Jews, formerly the people who don't fight back, have now become the people who bring a knife to a gunfight; an improvement, no doubt, but not enough of an improvement to avoid the festering sore of the neverending Arab/Israeli war. The Jews, apparently, still have a lot to learn about how to get along in the world. Lesson number one is that no good deed goes unpunished. If they can learn that, then it may be possible to arrive at a final settlement of the conflict, rather than another final solution.
The orthodox have an inordinate presence in Israel, especially in Jerusalem. Per their instuctions, the western wall is devided into male and female sections. Their influence on the national government is intrusive, and perverse. There is no civil marriage here, and all public transportation is grounded on Saturday. Worse, they seem to claim for themselves the mantle of true judiasm, and the rest of the country puts up very little resistance. All of this stuff is offensive for its intrusion on the lives of others, and they shouldn't be allowed to do it, but most of it is politics as usual, and the orthodox Jews are far less vile in their tyranny than orthodox Christians and Moslems. But their implicit claim to be the only true Jews...that, I take personally. It pisses me off that these guys think they're more Jewish than I am, given that we'd all be thrown into the same oven if the furhurs or the muftis or the grand dragons have their way. But why, given that they have the theology and I don't? I concede to them the religion, but not the jewishness. So I guess I agree with Hitler on this. We're a tribe you can't quit. The religion is almost irrelevant to identity, like Catholicism is almost irrelevant to being Italian. Part of the problem is semantic; we need another word for the religion - let's keep Jew for the tribe. Mosaish? So that makes two points of agreement I have with the fuhrer; we are also both of the opinion that it's best to put on your pants one leg at a time. If I think of any more I'll pass them on.
Masada and the Dead Sea
Time to rent a car. Car rental companies seem to be running a scam almost everywhere I've ever been, but in Israel it's been taken to new depths. I thought it was bad in America, where two or three companies monopolize the industry, local governments levee blatantly unconstitutional taxes and the desk agents terrorize renters into buying insurance they don't need at laughably high rates. Here, they rent cars the way Canon sells printers (the printer is almost free; it's the ink they're really selling, at prices Chateau Lafitte wishes it could get). You can rent a good car for $6 a day, but before you drive it off the lot they've tacked on 6 times that amount in mandatory fees and insurance. Goniffs.
Back on the tourist trail, we headed out one day to Masada, a two hour drive from Tel Aviv that brings you into a different world. In an unpopulated desert bordering the dead sea there is an isolated hilltop archeological site that is one of the most unusual Roman artifacts anywhere. There's no denying the existence of a virtual ancient city built out here in the middle of nowhere 2000 years ago, but it wasn't built by the Jews who made it famous by dying there in the first century CE, it was largely built, and later abandoned, by Herod, the Roman governor of Palestine in the previous century, if you believe Josephus, the Roman/Jewish historian who is pretty much the only source for everything we think we know about Masada. Exactly why Herod would do such a thing remains unclear, at least to me, but there certainly was a fortified palace there available for capture by a faction (a rather disreputable faction according to Josephus) of rebellious Jews during the anti-Roman revolt in Palestine that at that point had already seen the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem. The ruins left to be seen, and clambored over, by tourists today are from the Roman period, and the story of the Jew's last stand in 73 CE is mostly just a story. There is very little physical evidence of it at the site, with the exception of a huge ramp built by the besieging romans, a ramp that now serves as a convenient access route for visitors who, like us, prefer to avoid the cable car running up from the dead sea side. So, if you like Roman ruins (check) it's worth visiting for that reason alone. But the site's fame rests on the story of the (Jonestown sized) mass suicide that marked the end of the siege and that the moderm Israelis seem to have fetishised. They bring freshly minted inductees into the IDF up here for for their initiation ceremony. Why? Do they see this death-rather-than-surrender thing as the ideal behavior of a Jewish soldier? Does any other country try to indoctrinate their soldiers like this? It's hard to take any of this death and glory stuff seriously, but isn't the standard ideal to die fighting, rather than to die surrendering? Can you draw a line from this distorted version of heroism to the modern Jews who say that Hitler failed, because we're still here? Or to the Israeli government, that swaps busloads of imprisoned Arab murderers for handfuls of innocent hostages?
Not a happy place, Masada, and after a few hours we were ready for what was sure to be the goofy fun of swimming in the dead sea. Turns out it's not so easy to get there from the western side of Masada despite the fact that, from the top, it looks like a short walk; there are no direct roads, as we discovered. So we drove around the long way, past several Arab villages offering camel rides and finding no takers, and, an hour and a half later, arrived at the shoreline that sported a string of Miami-ish hotels, none of which seemed to have more than a couple of customers. By then it was late in the afternoon, but the outdoor thermometer at the beach we picked was still stuck at 41oC. It wasn't quite that hot, but it was way too hot to lie about in the sun, so we plunged right into the saturated salt solution that looks deceptively like water. It isn't. Walking in it only knee deep is enough to convince you it's denser than water, and of course you float like a cork. We splashed around, took the requisite photos, rinsed off with fresh water, and left. An hour, tops. Lots of fun, and a welcome antidote to the grim drama left behind on the plateau. Apparently, there's also some sort of take-the-waters mudbath scam going on here, but we didn't encounter it. Maybe it has something to do with the existence of the highrise hotels, since a dip in the dead sea seems like a day trip to me. But then why are all the hotels so empty? Is there an off season for quack therapies? Not caring enough to investigate, we headed back to Tel Aviv.
Haifa and the Galilee
We went to Haifa to see the Baha'i gardens. Very pretty. Definitely worth seeing, and a relief from the Moslem/Jew tension that suffuses everything else. Baha'i is a fairly new faith that, according to our very animated guide, accepts all the precepts and prophets of all the other faiths, ancient and modern, ignoring all the obvious contradictions, and, of course, the utter nonsense of the whole enterprise. Still, they seem like they want to make nice - why can't we all just get along? - and they have built a very beautiful garden overlooking the sea. I asked the guide how they felt about Joseph Smith - was he in the pantheon with Jesus and Muhammad and Thor? He didn't seem to know, so I refrained from pressing on about the tooth fairy and Harry Potter (my personal favorite supernatural being). Curiously, adherents are not allowed to live in Israel, even though the religion is headquartered there. The nescessary personnel are rotated in and out so as not to establish residence. No one seems to know why, but I suspect anti-Semitism, don't you? Ok, maybe it's not, but I wanted an excuse to use that word, so that I can seague into a rant about why that term is itself anti-Semitic, and about the use of language and the Jews. Here goes:
Only the Jews seem to have a special word to describe the bigotry against them: anti-Semitism. Sounds almost academic, doesn't it? Like antinomianism, or anticommunism. An intellectual philosophy, rather than a murderous creed. Senator Eastland was not an anti-melanist. He was a racist. Likewise all those haters of the Chinese, the Mexicans, the Indians (both kinds), the moslems etc. etc. - racists, all. Of course the Jews are often of the same race as their haters, but they are also often of the same linguistic group ("Semite" refers to the language group that includes Hebrew and Arabic.). Languages evolve. "Racist" has replaced "bigot" as the epithet of choice. "Bigot" might be technically more correct, but that ship has sailed. Jews, and everyone else, should stop using the euphemistic word anti-Semite and call Goebels and Henry Ford and Amadenajed and Yasir Arafat and the Israel boycotters and their legions of confreres what they are: racists. Let them own it - loud and proud. Language matters.
The Jews are as guilty as anyone else for this dereliction of language, and that's not their only sin. Consider for example, the word Palestinian. Even the Jews seem to go along with the morphing of this word, for centuries the term for the people who live in Palestine, the sliver of land between the Jordan River and the sea. Now it seems to refer only to the Arabs who live there, or, at least certainly not to the Jews who do. By any rational lexigraphic interpretation there are Palestinian Arabs and Palestinian Jews, but to the racist language police the Palestinian Jews are now the Israeli Jews, as if Israel weren't part of Palestine. This is not a subtle shift in meaning and it is shameful for the Jews to go along with it. As Orwell observed, language affects thought. You're led to think differently if a dispute in Ireland is framed, say, as between Catholic and Protestant Irishmen, rather than between Irishmen and Protestants. Ireland for the Irish!
OK, now that I got that off my chest we can move on to Zipori national park (more great Roman ruins, including a synagogue with a mosaic floor), Narareth (skipped it) and the sea of Galilee. The latter is actually a freshwater lake, and if JC or anyone else ever walked on water it probably wasn't here, but on the dead sea, which feels like you could almost do it yourself if you wear styrofoam shoes and have good balance. On the other hand, we saw a guy walking on the surface of the Mediterranean Sea at Caesarea (another great Roman site, a few miles down the coast from Haifa), but I chose to believe he was walking on submerged stones. We hung out for a while in Tiberius on the S. of G., but there's not much happening there. Reminded us of Asbury Park in its most rundown state, a couple of decades ago. It's a pretty big town but the waterfront was almost deserted. A far cry from the beaches of Tel Aviv, teeming with beautiful people sipping cocktails in beach chairs in front of fancy hotels. We didn't stay long.
I wanted to drive further north, to see more of Galilee and the Golan heights, but, even though Israel is only as big as New Jersey, it seemed too far for the time we had. At that point Israel didn't seem so small, but neither does NJ if you have to drive the length of it. We drove back to the city and had dinner in an italian restaurant, which is as good a sign as any that it was time to move on to Europe. We left plenty of sights unseen, and restaurants unsampled, so we're not averse to returning some day. And that day may involve more than tourism, since it is not unimaginable that we might have to flee the US at some point (certainly no more unimaginable than it was for German Jews in 1933) and what other country would have us? Well, I told you it wasn't going to be a ordinairy travelogue.